|
I hope there are still people around to read this, since I try to
wait at least a week before I respond to things that offend me. I have
had time to think about this report and analyze the details, so here
goes: On the show, the Church's report is quoted as
saying that the two men were "lewd, profane, and groping." It even
displays some of the reports, the third of which was cut off after the
first paragrph. Here's the full text (and for those of you who hate to
read, the key phrases are in highlighted):
SALT LAKE CITY
17 July 2009
There has been a
good deal of publicity surrounding an incident where two men
were cited for trespassing because of belligerent and
profane behavior on the Church Plaza, which is an extension
of the Salt Lake City Temple grounds and Church
headquarters. While this property is owned by the Church, we
want it to be a place of beauty and serenity in downtown
Salt Lake City for everyone.
As we said
earlier on this matter, these men were asked to stop
engaging in behavior deemed inappropriate for any couple on
the Plaza. There was much more involved than a simple kiss
on the cheek. They engaged in passionate kissing, groping,
profane and lewd language, and had obviously been using
alcohol. They were politely told that the Plaza was not the
place for such behavior and asked to stop. When they became
belligerent, the two individuals were asked to leave Church
property. Church security detained them and Salt Lake City
police were called.
There is nothing
satisfying in learning that there have been problems for
anyone on Church property. We hope the Plaza will continue
to be an asset to the community and enjoyed by the many that
cross it each day.
Now, regarding the straight couple that made out in broad daylight, they could at most be called mildly inappropriate. Let's break down the full description, according to the report above, and see if they match: - Passionate kissing: You call that passionate? Come on, there was hardly any tongue involved, if at all.
- Groping: None that I could see, unless you count some gentle handling of the back, neck, and waist.
- Profane and lewd language: Nope, they were too busy kissing for that.
- Using alcohol: No breathalyzers available to know for sure, but they were walking pretty steadily.
Perhaps
there's more that Stephen didn't show, but all I have to work with is
those clips. As far as that footage is concerned, a plaza official
might at most shake his head and keep an eye on them. From what I encounter
at the public schools where I've taught, an average pair of 15 year-olds would have quite a bit to teach
these two kids. Come to think of it, even the "missionaries" on Matt and Derek's couch did a better job. Heck, if I were a passerby, I could easily have
mistaken them for a young LDS couple giving in slightly to their "mor-mones"
(which are no less raging than regular hormones, but generally kept
under tight control - a tricky situation for Mormon kids with a predilection for bondage). Speaking of having limited footage
to work with, the video surveillance shows nothing of Derek and
Matt's behavior before the confrontation, so it's impossible to know
for sure what they actually did to elicit a response. Also, since
there's not sound, we can't hear the conversation. What I did see
was several men in suits, some of them visibly uncomfortable, talking
to the two men in question. Their apparent gestures were relatively
calm, while their targets seemed somewhat more agitated. The security
guards reach for them, and both resist, Matt more aggressively than
Derek. Matt is eventually subdued by several men, who continue to hold
him, while Derek ends up on a bench to endure further scolding. The
video cuts off soon afterward, but it looks like they were preparing to
escort them off the premises and into police custody (Wow, it's like
Rodney King all over again, only with much more focus on the man-on-man
action!). But don't just take my word - Look it up on Youtube and form
your own opinion.
Here's another notable fact. According to a UCLA
study, from 1990 to 2006, Utah’s per-capita households headed by
same-sex
couples sprang from 38th in the nation to 14th. So it seems that gay
couples are not a rare minority to be easily ostracized due to their
small numbers, but are in fact an increasingly prevalent demographic.
Sadly, I must admit this probably means a lot of less-tolerant people
are on the lookout for "gay behavior" and will attempt to persecute it
to the fullest extent of the law. For those actions, I apologize on
behalf of my fellow Mormons (Then again, why should I do it? They're the hateful ones!). As
for the church itself, just yesterday it "declared its support of
nondiscrimination regulations that would extend protection in matters
of housing and employment in Salt Lake City to those with same-sex
attraction." I admit the overtness of this statement is probably in
response to recent negative publicity, but our doctrine clearly
supports this stance. The article goes on to clarify that "the Church
also remains 'unequivocally committed to defending the bedrock
foundation of marriage between a man and a woman.'" Without getting too
sidetracked, let me say that I did a lot of work in favor of
California's Proposition 8, but most of us doing so were still
conflicted about the issue. Many of us believe that it does not go far
enough, and the government should not perform marriages at all. Let
them grant civil unions to everyone, and leave "marriage" to be
solemnized by religious institutions for whomever they see fit. That's
all I will say on the matter. The
bottom line of my argument is that I don't defend any unjust actions by
the people in my Church, but this segment went too far. Stephen's
principle of truthiness went beyond the overt message and infiltrated
what was supposed to be genuine truth on a deeper level. To
those of you who used the segment as an excuse to bolster your own
negative views of the LDS Church and it's people, I hope you will look
deeper into all the good that we do in the world, and how fairly our
sincere believers treat those who are not in line with our principles.
In fact, I urge you to keep watch for those of us who are unfair. There are too many of them around, thinking they're better than everyone else, and they deserve a good slap upside the head.
To my fellow Mormons who were offended to the point of anger, I ask
that you please try to keep things in perspective. You accomplish very
little by posting threats of boycotts and making arguments with way too
much emotion and not enough reason. I, for one, remain a loyal citizen
of the Colbert Nation.
P.S. - I hope my feeble attempts at humor did not distract from my
overall argument; I think I've been watching a few too many segments of "The
Word." Message Edited by seeker149 on 11-11-2009 12:15 PM Message Edited by seeker149 on 11-11-2009 12:15 PM Message Edited by seeker149 on 11-11-2009 12:16 PM Message Edited by seeker149 on 11-12-2009 09:40 AM
|